Around the beginning of the year, voters in South Carolina received mailings that noted the former Massachusetts governor’s position on illegal immigration.
“The mailer talks about putting an end to magnets or benefits that illegal immigrants have,” a local South Carolina publication quoted a Romney campaign spokesman, Ryan Williams, as saying, “ensuring a tamper-proof system that allows employers to check the status of their employees and creating a strong border fence.”
“The Obama administration is opposed to common sense immigration laws,” SummervillePatch.com quoted Williams as saying. “With Romney’s plan there would be no magnets, no jobs, no holes in the borders.”Well it turns out that Mr. Romney himself has roots in Mexico and that his Grandparents were ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO MEXICO and then Mittens' dad was born in Mexico and "came back" to the U.S. It turns out that Mitt Romney can be the first Hispanic President of the United States.
Here is Rubin Naverette (a Right Wing guy himself) at cnn.com
What is even more interesting is that "Mittens" just picked up the endorsement of those who wrote Arizona's hateful Immigration Law. According to the HuffPo's Elise Foley:
WASHINGTON -- GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney announced on Wednesday an endorsement from Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state who helped write laws meant to drive immigrants out of states like Arizona and Alabama....
.... In a statement released Wednesday, Romney praised Kobach's efforts to cut down on unauthorized immigration and said he will support the South Carolina and Alabama immigration laws..
"I'm so proud to earn Kris's support," Romney said. "Kris has been a true leader on securing our borders and stopping the flow of illegal immigration into this country."
Of course the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) disagrees with this as Kobach was legal counsel to FAIR:
Or should I say, "primo!" As much as it embarrasses me to admit it, given some of his views and how he expresses them, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee and I could be distant cousins. Romney's father, George, was born in Chihuahua, Mexico, and so was my grandfather, Roman.
Que? You didn't know that Mitt Romney was half-Mexican? It's true. In fact, if he makes it to the White House, in addition to becoming the first Mormon in the Oval Office, he could also be the nation's first Hispanic president....
.....Romney's great-grandfather, Miles Park Romney, fled the United States and crossed into Mexico in 1885 to escape religious persecution. He helped build the Mormon enclave of Colonia Juarez in Chihuahua.
Miles Park Romney never became a Mexican citizen, and neither did his son, Gaskell, or grandson, George. They were all denied Mexican citizenship because statutes on the books in Mexico denied that right to American settlers and their offspring.Apparently Mitt Romney's family first illegally entered Mexico in 1885, tried to become citizens of Mexico and were denied citizenship. It seems that they then came back seeking... what is it Mitt says... "economic magnets". Man, if we had, had the laws that Mitt and xenophobic friends propose for the border now, I bet Mitt wouldn't have been allowed back. After all, his grandfather LEFT the U.S. (so much for American exceptionalism)...
What is even more interesting is that "Mittens" just picked up the endorsement of those who wrote Arizona's hateful Immigration Law. According to the HuffPo's Elise Foley:
WASHINGTON -- GOP presidential hopeful Mitt Romney announced on Wednesday an endorsement from Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state who helped write laws meant to drive immigrants out of states like Arizona and Alabama....
.... In a statement released Wednesday, Romney praised Kobach's efforts to cut down on unauthorized immigration and said he will support the South Carolina and Alabama immigration laws..
"I'm so proud to earn Kris's support," Romney said. "Kris has been a true leader on securing our borders and stopping the flow of illegal immigration into this country."
Of course the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) disagrees with this as Kobach was legal counsel to FAIR:
The Southern Poverty Law Center says FAIR is a racist organization. The center’s report on Kobach describes the Republican as a political opportunist, comparing him to the character of con man Harold Hill in the musical “The Music Man.”
“Like Hill, they say, Kobach comes to town with big ideas and a can-do attitude but leaves behind a trail of tears — huge legal bills and unworkable laws coupled with social turmoil,” the report said.and of course Kobach's support of racial profiling:
Kobach, 44, has spent much of his professional life developing the legal framework that a growing number of state and local officials have used to justify anti-immigration proposals. A rising star in the GOP establishment, Kobach—a professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School—joined John Ashcroft's Justice Department days before 9/11. Over the next two years, he helped create a program that required all visiting citizens from 25 mostly Arab countries to be fingerprinted and monitored—a policy that critics said amounted to racial profiling.I wonder what Kobach would say about Mittens and his grandfather.
Wait, this is a bit unclear.
ReplyDeleteMitt's father and/or grandfather came to the US illegally? Or went to Mexico illegally?
If it is the later, I don't see any contrast with his immigration positions. He is not seeking to preside over the Mexican immigration enforcement system, after all.
Anyway, to me the whole thing highlights the ridiculousness of having the minority category "Hispanic" which can apply to any race or ethnicity.
Mitt's grandfather moved to Chihuahua in 1885 and was denied citizenship. I imagine that made him illegal at that time. THEN he moved back here and maybe never lost his American citizenship.
ReplyDeleteThe thing is that Mitt who is such an enemy of "illegal immigration" is the child of someone born in Mexico, and whose grandfather LEFT the U.S. was denied citizenship in Mexico and came back. To be denied that you have to apply for it.
Anyway, it is just another example of Mitt vs. Mitt.
Not too mention that Mitt favors the AZ Immigration laws and crazies that support it as well as being proud of being supported by a known facilitator of Racial Profiling. You know the "Show me your papers" law. I wonder how those folks would/will look at Romney.
ReplyDeleteI hate to be contrarian, but find this a tawdry effort. Rather than just pump out a diary, why not take the time to ensure it is accurate and informative? This comes off as a simple partisan attack.
ReplyDeleteThe Romneys were American and had the right to go back to the USA after they were denied citizenship in Mexico.
They apparently left the USA to escape religious persecution, not to seek economic prosperity.
The UDHR gives everyone the right to asylum and return to his country.
Romney's position has nothing really to do with his great-grandfather's actions, which were not economic. Actually, his family was treated in Mexico consistent with what he seems to advocate here, that illegal entry should not afford rights, even though asylum claims have heightened legitimacy.
Also, Kobach was not legal counsel to FAIR, either, but its legal arm, and I wish the liberal side had lawyers as sharp as he seems to be.
Overall, the rhetoric, once more, goes over the top in my view. To misrepresent issues is not really different than what the other side does. Self-described Progressives should conform to a higher standard. To me it is wrong to think that most who disagree are by nature unprincipled and acting in bad faith. I already hear that too much when I try and defend Israel.
The reasons for these laws, well founded or not, is not because of hatred, but economics and prejudice. The legal issue is preemption under the Supremacy Clause versus inherent authority of the states to enforce federal law. The overall issue is not subject to easy answers because of the colliding interests, and using legal means to address such complex and controversial matters reinforces the rule of law.
I also think it was a mistake to post at Daily Kos under the Jews for Obama rubric. What has this to do with Jewish support anyway? For that reason, why not post it as a stand alone?
I am speaking out because I value a progressive approach and do not believe this constitutes one, but rather emulates much of what I also reject when done from the other side.
FWIW
Your position is noted. I disagree with it BUT, it is noted
ReplyDeleteOne thing about the post at DKos - for some reason I can't post under my name there and have to post to a group. SO.. I posted to this. Though I would have re-published to it if I posted under my name.
FWIW
Cool. Thanks for the explanation.
ReplyDeleteI don't think anyone has a good handle on what to do about the matter of immigration reform, no matter which side of the issue one is on. I do believe that anti-discrimination laws must be enforced, however, irrespective of which legal approach prevails.