Tuesday, March 6, 2012

On Useful Idiocy and David Harris Gershon

It has come to my attention that there are still supposed liberals and progressives (on Daily Kos, of course) maintaining that baptizing my dead relatives into the Mormon Church against theirs and my will is no big deal. Just, you know, shit happens and I should stop complaining. As usual, these supposed 'progressive' thinkers are defended, excused, and inspired by wannabe author and serial failure David Harris Gershon.

Apparently they also maintain that dog whistles about Jewish control of the government and disloyal Jewish senators that are drawn straight out of Neo-Nazi rhetoric are also just fine. After all, what a terrible, 'chilling effect on free speech' it would be if one were to insist on norms of respectful behavior that have long ago been accepted in regard to every other ethnic group. Without being able to insinuate in polite company that Jews or Jewish interests control the government and that Jewish-American politicians are disloyal... well how in Earth would people be able to insinuate that Jews or Jewish interests control the government and Jewish-American politicians are disloyal?? Down with censorship!

And I am also told that in spite of a mountain of convincing evidence that includes, well fuck, everything, many people who claim to be on the side of the political aisle that favors rationality are simply unable to wrap their heads around the simple concept that Jews are a people, not a religion. Nope, in spite of a mountain of genetic and historical evidence, they can't process it. I kid you not, there are seriously people seemingly unable to understand this.

-------------------

Now, I learned long ago not to be surprised at these attitudes from supposedly "progressive" quarters. Still, it does still manage to amaze me that a few Jewish people themselves (or at least those claiming on the anonymous internet to be Jewish) often love to provide cover for their own haters. For purveyors of antisemitism, Jewish useful idiots are the most useful idiots of all.

One particularly prominent useful idiot (as prominent as one can be in a web-based echo chamber filled with a rapidly diminishing number of readers such as Daily Kos), who goes by the affore mentioned name name of David Harris Gershon, recently tried the "look over there!" tactic, where when an episode of antisemitism is pointed out the person says 'oh yeah, but these other people have it way worse than us successful happy educated Jews'. Often the 'other people over there' are Muslims, as it was in this case. Now I'm not going to get into a pissing contest about who suffers worse discrimination, other than to refer to this chart or the hundreds like it that are readily available from 2 milliseconds of web searching:


CNS-WED-3-FBI-HATE


See that, not even in their worst year right after 9/11 were anti-Muslim incidents anywhere as common as anti-Jewish incidents in the US. And this is not privileged information that you have to be a genius like me to get. It is just right there for everyone. And yet, the statements of useful idiots asserting exactly the contrary go unchallenged and accepted in a forum that is supposedly for the 'reality based' side of the political aisle.

Again, I shouldn't be surprised. I do recall that this person is so eager to be useful to antisemites that he would write a diary with a title such as "Criticism of Israel is not Antisemitic" only to be presented with myriad examples where criticism of Israel was in fact highly antisemitic, you know of the "Israeli vampires are harvesting our childrens' organs and blood" variety. Instead of, say, admitting a mistake, Gershon would simply change the title to something less dramatic so that nobody would know he made a boo boo, and go on earning the accolades and twitter follows of antisemites and his fellow useful idiots. Par for the course.

---------------

But this David Harris Gershon character is a useful idiot that not only excels in the useful part, he is also an overachiever in the idiot part (Jews are known for overachieving, after all). See, he would have us believe that in spite of being thus far unable to obtain a much coveted book deal, the thing he wants more than anything and writes about every day, he actually turned down the chance to have a national TV interview on the leading newsmagazine regarding his experience as the spouse of a terrorist victim, and will claim with with a straight face (to the extent that faces are relevant in anonymous web forums) that he did so out of some sort of principle.

While this explanation may fool the sort of feeble minds who can't even understand the simple concept of Jewish peoplehood or why one might justifiably be the slightest tad offended at having their dead relatives baptized against their will, in the real world, outside of the bubble, normal thinking people see right through that unbelievable bullshit.

For those that don't know (which can't be very many people because he says it every two seconds) a hate filled terrorist tried to blow up Gershon, did injure his wife, and killed several other people. Now, let's think about this: Within in the bubble that exists in forums such as Daily Kos, "I am a lowly middle aged male substitute kindergarten teacher who wants to hug the rage filled America-hating person who maimed my wife and did kill several other people" earns a bunch of oohs and aahs and "OMG I love you so much you brave brave man."

But outside of the bubble, in front of a national TV audience? Not so much. If that story ever got airtime, the same story that is peddled within the bubble, Gershon would become the most reviled laughing stock in America. Forget Bill O'Reilly, I'm talking Bill Maher and Ed Shultz and every other person with a pulse and a shred of dignity would be making fun of this guy. He would be our version of the recent Italian sea captain, only about 100 times more reviled. The butt of jokes and true scorn. "I want to hug him" might become the new "Don't touch my junk". We're due for a new buzzphrase, anyway.

It is obvious why he backed out of the TV interview, if one was ever actually on offer. And it is also painfully obvious, for the same reason, why mainstream publishers do not want to touch his book with my ten foot pole. But he thinks that that the rest of us don't see that big chunk of obviousness before us. He has confused the bubble with the real world. Unreality has taken over from reality. And that, my friends, is idiotic.

21 comments:

  1. Nothing I can add, aside from a hearty "very well said, sir!"

    ~~~~
    ~~~~

    ::Follow JayinPhiladelphia on Twitter!::

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is a terrible history, indeed, of forced conversions of the living, but the Mormons are not engaging in the same conduct, so far as I am concerned. That is not to say it is not offensive.

    But how does it meet the EU definition? I do not think it does, and the fact that it is not limited to Jews only strengthens my belief that is it different in nature than the other conduct involved that you mentioned.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, it does meet the definition.

    "Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non­Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities."

    http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/material/pub/AS/AS-WorkingDefinition-draft.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  4. well then I stand corrected. I'm seriously all choked up here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't really understand the last remark, and I do not tolerate antisemitism, but just do not see it from the Mormons, and I do not believe it is a threat.

    To me, it's better to focus on the conduct that shows hatred toward Jews, which the person you mentioned enables.

    No need to say much more, unless you want. I was more interested to offer the observation, and I did.

    ReplyDelete
  6. oh sorry, it is a joking reference to the person in question. In his quest for Twitter followers, which a publisher supposedly said he needed before they would even consider the book (probably just to get rid of him), he is constantly saying how "choked up" or "on the verge of tears" he is about the silliest little things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If one wants to see what a Jew who stands against the Jewish People looks like, they should look to the person you question. Beyond the fact that he makes common cause with the antisemites, one only need look at several of those that recommended his "Hey! Look over there!" diary from last night. Among those recommenders were many of the antisemites, one of whom is so notorious that he is infamous for his "quality uprates" of antisemitic comments.

    I suppose my being a proud Jew makes some people numb. Oh well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. One thing fiz... U.I. is just what his moniker says "an idiot". He loves to carry water for those who would just assume see us wiped out. In return for what... a bunch of twitter followers and crazed cat people that he can share hugs and tears with as he goes numb at the latest Israeli outrage.

    I would caution however the making of U.I. as a general principle when it comes to the Progressive Movement. For sure there is anti-Semitism there as we see daily at DKos, but there are also a lot of people that supported Mets' diary and voiced their concerns (as they did at our letter from 8 months ago).

    I am proud to be Progressive and I am not going to cede this movement to the bigots. Just as I like to fight the bigots on the Right - it's ok to fight the bigots on the left as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amen brother. I can't dispute any of this. That's why I called them so-called progressives and what not. This movement is ours, not theirs.

      Delete
  9. Paul in San FranciscoMarch 6, 2012 at 3:49 PM

    Useful Idiot's desire to hug the people who brutalized his wife reminds me of the interview question that helped torpedo Mike Dukakis's presidential campaign. Except that Dukakis came across more macho than Useful Idiot.

    Useful Idiot has made a cottage industry out of giving cover to anti-semites. I can't say I even begin to understand his particular form of pathology. An unhealthy portion of low self-esteem, coupled with rampant narcissism, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your right! I hadn't thought of that analogy.

      At least Dukakis wanted to keep the guy in jail, IIRC, just not execute him.

      Now one might ask isn't UI practicing a 'turn the other cheek' philosophy like Gandhi? And the answer is hell no. Because UI is not turning his cheek. By constantly excusing antisemitism and defending its purveyors, he is trying to turn everyone else's cheek. He wants other people to take his licks. And that is not Gandhi-esque non-violence - it is pure cowardice.

      Delete
  10. This banh mi's got me blubbering and sobbing and shit, man. I just want to give it a hug before it's all gone.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am about to get some vindaloo tonight that is going to have me so choked up and in tears that I'm going to have to put out 100 tweets about how some kindergarteners "inspire" me.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why peoplehood is such a hard concept has never been clear to me.

    I understand why it's threatening to the Israel-haters. No wonder they pull crap about the Khazars out of the air, and try to rewrite Jewish history. But I was baffled, especially in college, by the number of well-meaning people who could learn other people's concepts of peoplehood, their history, their self-concept and definition, and take it as absolute gospel. Then I would try to explain, and their brains would shut down, because being Jewish was sort of like being Protestant except with Anne Frank, and not Jesus.

    Race confuses 'em more than anything. The fact that my Ashkenazi self insisted on being one people, and one lineage with Ethiopian Jews simply didn't compute, and no matter what, they would keep pulling out an American/European concept of race and trying to fit it over am Yisrael.

    Enough to drive a person crazy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree you have put it so well.

      I am driven to almost craziness by the mental block people have to understanding the simple concept of Jewish peoplehood.

      I have no explanation, other than to anti-Israel people it is for some reason really important to keep denial of Jewish peoplehood going. I think that if their claims rely on obviously disproven claims, then that is all the worse for them.

      Delete
  13. Zionist vindaloo convergence! Heh. Ekta is not only one of the highest thought-of Indian restaurants in Philadelphia, but it's also just 12 blocks from my new apartment; and they do free delivery, too! I will be quite the regular, eat-in and delivery, once I get there in 12 days.

    Their rogan josh is STUNNING, I hear. The biryani is BREAKING: WEEPING! it's been said...

    ReplyDelete
  14. The same "Americans" who approve of the police pepper spraying, beating, and imprisoning OWS for exercising their right to peacefully protest will also be turning in Real Patriots who battle the emerging communism in America (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20120052-503544.html). The world has seen all this before. In colonial America most colonists believed the British propaganda about our Forefathers being crazies and terrorists. They helped the Red Coats capture many of them. In communist Russia, informers and government laplickers were everywhere. Ditto for Nazi Germany. Their kind will do anything to ingratiate themselves to the authorities and save their own skins. These people try to convince us THEY'RE the real patriots because they "stand behind America", but they're just the opposite. America wouldn't be descending into communism if it weren't for their stupidity. REMEMBER, COMMUNISTS AND NAZIS DON'T PUT PEOPLE AWAY FOR TELLING LIES, IT'S FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. Finally, OWS and RON PAUL'S GENUINE ORIGINAL TEA PARTY have one very important thing in common: They both know the "jewish" bankers are behind most of the world's economic, political, and social problems and have been for a very long time (http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm).

    DEAN BERRY MINISTRIES: "When a government outlaws 'terrorism', it's planning something for which 'terrorism' is the only recourse. Obviously."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your comment is such a nonsensical non-sequitur that it has me all choked up.

      Delete